
The movement to ban SNAP purchases of soda is gaining momentum in a few US states, sparking debates about public health and personal choice.
Key Takeaways
- HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is encouraging states to apply for waivers to ban soda purchases with SNAP benefits.
- West Virginia and Utah have taken legislative steps to restrict soda purchases with SNAP benefits.
- Critics argue these measures do not address broader issues of food access and autonomy.
- The USDA, alongside proponents, supports these initiatives to improve nutritional standards.
State-Level Initiatives
West Virginia and Utah are leading initiatives to ban the purchase of soda with SNAP benefits. West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey announced last week that he would be submitting a waiver to the USDA. In Utah, Governor Spencer Cox has also signed legislation ordering the state’s Health Department to submit a similar waiver.
These steps intend to align with efforts to “Make America Healthy Again” led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. By focusing SNAP benefits on healthier food options, these states aim to enhance nutritional standards and reduce taxpayer-funded subsidies on unhealthy products.
Critics and Concerns
Not everyone is onboard with these efforts. Newsweek reports that Dr. Ben Chrisinger from Tufts University has expressed skepticism, noting the limited availability and high costs of healthy foods in some areas. This approach is seen by some as paternalistic, potentially stigmatizing SNAP recipients by imposing restrictions that may not tackle root issues in “food deserts.”
Some critics argue that such measures undermine the autonomy of the recipients and do not directly tackle the larger problem of access to healthy food options.
Advocacy and Support
The USDA, led by Secretary Brooke Rollins, has promised technical assistance to states such as West Virginia that show initiative in this area. Rollins has praised these efforts, seeing them as part of a broader campaign to improve health outcomes through targeted legislative action.
During a floor debate involving Utah’s bill, state Rep. Kristen Chevrier said, “We should not force Utahns to eat certain foods, and we are not doing that, but we should also not use tax funds to subsidize choices that don’t have nutritional value.”
With 42 million Americans participating in SNAP, these proposed changes could have a significant influence nationwide.
Sources
- RFK Jr. Issues New Directive After State’s SNAP Move on Soda
- RFK Jr. says states can – and should – block soda from food stamps benefits
- States Move to Ban Using Food Stamps for Soda