
Donald Trump’s recent criticism of Seth Meyers illuminates the ongoing tension between the president and late-night television hosts.
Story Snapshot
- Trump criticized Seth Meyers as “a truly deranged lunatic” and “100% anti-Trump.”
- The criticism followed Meyers’ commentary on aircraft carrier technology.
- Trump’s statements highlight his contentious relationship with media figures.
- This incident adds to the discourse on political commentary in entertainment.
Trump’s Critique of Meyers’ Talent and Bias
On November 1, 2025, Donald Trump launched a verbal attack on NBC’s Seth Meyers, labeling him as “the least talented person to ‘perform’ live in the history of television.” Trump’s remarks were not just a critique of Meyers’ comedic chops but also a direct jab at what he perceives as Meyers’ consistent anti-Trump bias. This public denunciation underscores Trump’s long-standing disdain for media figures who critique his policies and persona.
Trump’s criticism came after he claimed to have watched Meyers’ show “for the first time in years.” Trump took particular issue with Meyers’ discussion on the use of electric catapults on aircraft carriers—a topic Trump has previously criticized. Trump’s comments suggest a belief that Meyers’ coverage of military technology is not just misguided but also emblematic of broader media bias against him.
Historical Context of Trump’s Media Criticism
Trump’s contentious relationship with media figures, especially late-night hosts, is well-documented. This latest incident is part of a broader pattern where Trump challenges what he sees as biased coverage. Historically, late-night television has been a platform for political satire and critique, with hosts like Meyers frequently targeting Trump’s policies and statements. Meyers’ “A Closer Look” segment is particularly known for its in-depth analysis and criticism of Trump’s administration.
President Trump slams Seth Meyers as "a truly deranged lunatic" who is "100% anti Trump" https://t.co/yGEecbKcKa pic.twitter.com/MLaWLJZZ8h
— Decider (@decider) November 3, 2025
The timing of Trump’s criticism coincides with his ongoing political activities and public statements. Trump’s defense of steam catapults over electric ones on aircraft carriers isn’t new, yet it serves as a focal point for his critique of Meyers. By questioning Meyers’ talent and asserting his anti-Trump stance as “probably illegal,” Trump amplifies his message of media bias.
Implications for Late-Night Television and Political Commentary
The immediate effect of Trump’s comments is increased media coverage of his critique, potentially boosting viewership for Meyers’ show due to the controversy. In the short term, this incident may reinforce Meyers’ role as a prominent political commentator on television. Simultaneously, it fuels the ongoing debate about the role of entertainment in political discourse.
In the long term, this clash exemplifies the polarized media landscape, where Trump’s supporters and critics interpret such incidents through their respective lenses. For Meyers, the criticism may serve as validation of his influence and relevance in political commentary. For Trump, it reinforces his adversarial approach to media figures who challenge his views.
Broader Discourse on Media and Politics
Trump’s attack on Meyers is not merely a personal vendetta but rather a reflection of the broader discourse on media’s role in politics. Late-night hosts like Meyers have become significant voices in political commentary, using satire to engage audiences in political dialogue. Trump’s criticism highlights the tension between political figures and media personalities in shaping public opinion.
This incident underscores the challenges faced by media figures in navigating political satire while maintaining journalistic integrity. As the lines between entertainment and political commentary blur, the discourse around media’s influence and responsibility continues to evolve. Trump’s comments, though critical, reaffirm the impact of late-night television as a platform for political engagement and critique.












