
Taxpayers in Tennessee are on the hook for $1.9 million because a public university chose to fire a professor over a single angry Facebook post about Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Story Snapshot
- The University of Tennessee Board of Trustees approved a $1.9 million settlement with fired professor Tamar Shirinian.
- She was removed after a personal Facebook post celebrating conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination sparked political outrage.
- A federal judge said her comment was not “core political speech,” siding with the university on the legal standard.
- Shirinian will not be reinstated, but the university still chose a seven-figure payout funded by taxpayers.
What Happened Between the Professor and the University
Former University of Tennessee assistant professor Tamar Shirinian posted on her personal Facebook page after conservative activist Charlie Kirk was assassinated, using language that celebrated his death and called him a “disgusting psychopath.” Lawmakers and university officials quickly condemned the comments, and campus leaders faced intense public pressure to respond. Chancellor Donde Plowman labeled the post “gross misconduct” and placed Shirinian on administrative leave while starting termination proceedings. The university framed its actions as protecting its reputation and calming backlash.
Shirinian answered by filing a federal lawsuit in October 2025, claiming the university violated her First Amendment rights and targeted her for political speech made in a personal capacity, not as part of her job. She argued that the university punished her viewpoint because it offended powerful people, including elected officials and donors. Her lawsuit relied on a civil rights statute that allows citizens to sue government bodies for constitutional violations, and it sought reinstatement to her position along with damages. Supporters saw her case as part of a wider fight over campus free speech.
Why Tennessee Taxpayers Are Paying $1.9 Million
Despite the university’s tough stance, the University of Tennessee System Board of Trustees has now approved a settlement that will pay Shirinian $1.9 million to resolve her lawsuit. Court records and local reporting say the agreement is tentative but has cleared the Board, and Shirinian has said she is “very pleased” with the outcome. The deal means she will not return to her faculty job, but the university still pays a large sum rather than risk a jury trial. That money ultimately comes from public funds that taxpayers provide to support higher education.
The size of the settlement stands out because faculty usually lose speech cases against public universities. One study of more than 200 such lawsuits found that institutions win over 73 percent of the time, especially when they argue that employee speech disrupts operations or stems from job duties. In this case, a federal judge had already ruled that Shirinian’s Facebook comment was not “core political speech” and that the university’s interest in managing backlash outweighed her speech rights. Even with that legal advantage, the university chose to settle for nearly $2 million rather than press ahead.
Free Speech, Social Media, and the Power of Institutions
Shirinian’s case shows how messy free speech fights have become when public employees speak on social media. Courts now often apply rules that say the First Amendment does not protect speech that “owes its existence” to a person’s professional role, even if the speech happens off campus. Administrators at public universities use these rules to claim broad power over what faculty say online when controversy spills into the workplace. For many people on both the left and the right, this looks like a system that favors large institutions and punishes individuals who step out of line.
A former University of Tennessee professor who celebrated conservative influencer Charlie Kirk's murder on social media will receive a $1.9 million settlement after suing over her termination. 🔥 #NewsFireGR #News…
Read here 👇👇https://t.co/nPVWtK0byM— NewsFire.GR (@NewsFireGR) July 1, 2026
At the same time, taxpayers see the bill for these battles. Tennessee citizens who worry about rising costs, strained school budgets, and political games now watch $1.9 million leaving public coffers because leaders chose to fire first and settle later. Critics on the right call it proof that universities are ruled by fragile elites who cave to outrage then pay to clean up the mess. Critics on the left see another example of institutions controlling speech while avoiding real accountability. Both sides can agree on one thing: ordinary people are paying for decisions made far above their heads.
Sources:
washingtontimes.com, campus-speech.law.duke.edu, facebook.com, yahoo.com, instagram.com, knoxnews.com



